Meditation & The Silence

The following article is based upon the introduction to a series

of modules I wrote in the 1990's concerning the system of meditation
used by the brothers and sisters of the Order of Dionysis & Paul.
It was later published in book form entitled Notes on Meditation in 2011.

Time spent in the ‘Silence’ is an essential part of the Spiritual Life, a life few of any given generation are inspired to live as it means withdrawing from the world of the senses, which is no easy task. The difficulty in withdrawing from the world of the senses is in itself not a mystery; it is simply a question of motivation, because without motivation we will be unable to establish a stable presence in the interior world of the soul.

Motivation requires more than good intentions and an effort of will. It demands that our love of the divine be stronger than our love of the world, for it takes courage to enter the ‘silence’, entailing, as it does, letting go of the familiar world of the senses with all of its well known reference points.

Christ commanded any who would follow His teaching to give up all. His words: “Go, sell all that you have, give it to the poor and come, follow Me,” and “Unless you die to the world you cannot enter the kingdom of heaven” clearly establishes the importance of withdrawing from the world. However, such a task is not easy, as many who have tried and failed could testify.

It seems to be the case that of the few who do take up the spiritual life many are led to it through suffering. It might be through the stresses of living in this world, through illness or the death of a loved one, or it might be through war or famine; or perhaps through the loss of something important and or meaningful, indeed, it might well be a combination of such things. Whatever it is that acts as the catalyst, somewhere and at some point a person becomes sufficiently motivated to enter the interior world of the soul with the singular purpose of seeking and obtaining direct knowledge of the spiritual reality that is the substrate of life itself.

Self-knowledge, then, is the knowledge of the permanent spiritual nature that forms the basis of our existence; it is the “Light which lighteth the life of every man that cometh into the world”. However, for many, the idea of having a spiritual nature is little more than a vague notion clothed in a multitude of disturbing questions, a notion more often than not suppressed, even to the point of refusing to accept its existence.

Yet, in spite of such widespread negativity there exists a body of knowledge that speaks of the interior spiritual reality and its nature in a most beautiful and evocative manner. It speaks of a reality which lies beyond the realm of the senses; at the heart of which dwells the immortal essence of ‘Self’, which anyone may come to know directly. Since time immemorial this body of knowledge (the Tradition) has been passed from generation to generation, the same teaching expressed in different ways by different cultures; that each wave of incarnating souls might have access to the knowledge of their true nature.

Thus the New Testament teaches that the Kingdom of Heaven lies ‘within’ and that knowledge of it should be sought before anything else; whilst the Bhagavad-Gita commends us to retire to a solitary spot and ‘turn within’. This process of turning within is a discipline our more enlightened ancestors practised and taught along with prayer as being the only sure means of attaining direct knowledge of the spiritual reality that dwells within us all.

This discipline is embodied in the universal art of meditation. It is an art many have experimented with, and fortunately for most, the experience has been little more than a pleasant form of deep relaxation, which in itself is a great asset, but there is more to meditation than relaxation.

The word ‘Meditation’ has been in circulation for ever, so it would seem, but the question remains, what is meditation? Not so difficult a question to answer one might think, but popular opinion has become confused if not divided over this question. It clearly means different things to different people, although this has not always been the case.

Over the course of the last fifty years or so the term ‘meditation’ has come to mean two distinct things. On the one hand there is the traditional concept of meditation being an exercise in mind control directed towards self-knowledge and spiritual evolution, and on the other hand there is the modern concept of meditation being a therapeutic exercise in deep relaxation and active imagination directed towards inducing a sense of well-being, employed more often than not as an antidote to the stresses of modern living.

  

One side associates meditation with oriental religions and philosophies, where the archetypal image that presents itself to the imagination is of a Buddhist monk or Indian sadhu sitting cross-legged on a cushion or low wooden stool, eyes closed and breathing slowly; possibly chanting or repeating a mantra. The other side associates meditation with relaxation and creative visualisation, where a typical image that presents itself is that of a person relaxing in a comfortable chair, listening to ambient music and or a gentle voice describing an ‘ideal’ environment wherein the student allows the mind to wander. In recent times the most popular methods of meditation that have emerged in the modern world are themselves products of the imagination of that world. They are essentially guided imaginings deriving more from a syncretic blend of Spiritualism, Yoga, Buddhism and Shamanism, to name but a few, than from any school of traditional meditation, oriental or otherwise.

Most of these methods are derived neither from the ancient world, nor from the Far East, but emerged in Europe and its colonies; originating in the ideas and practises employed by nineteenth and early twentieth-century esoteric schools such as the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. This particular order is significant in that it became the archetypal model for the formation of a host of esoteric orders and movements in the English speaking world, most of which were deeply involved with the magical aspects of Western esotericism – especially with astral projection and all that such implies: and it implies a great deal where modern ideas about meditation are concerned.

Looking back a little further, it is possible to see how in the nineteenth century the emergence of these schools was an inevitable and natural expression of the interest in Hermetic and Rosicrucian thought and philosophy that emerged in seventeenth and eighteenth-century Europe. These schools were not only a focus for the theoretical, but also for the practical workings of Western esotericism.

The first half of the nineteenth century witnessed the resurgence of a form of ancestor worship in the guise of ‘spiritualism’, and the latter half of that century saw the emergence of the Theosophical Society, a movement that sought to create a universal religion based upon oriental religious ideas such as those fostered in Buddhism. This point is particularly significant because it was through the activities of this society that Hinduism and Buddhism, particularly Tibetan Buddhism, became so accessible to popular culture in the West. The high point of the Theosophical Society was the 1920’s and 1930’s. However, as was the case for many social movements of that time, the society’s growth and development was impeded by the drama of the Second World War. Curiously, as the world began its slow recovery from the effects of that dreadful war, public interest in the Theosophical Society began to fade. A paradoxical if not ironic turn of events, because it was at this time that popular interest in Hindu systems of yoga and meditation, nurtured by the Theosophical Society, began to grow in popularity.

Shamanism, on the other hand, did not emerge in popular Western culture until the late twentieth century, and then only in a romanticised form: its popularity, perhaps, being due to its association with chemically induced states of mind conducive to ‘astral projection’ and ‘channelling’; subjects that have either fascinated or horrified humanity from the earliest times. Exploring significant or interesting environments or worlds through the realm of the imagination is no new thing; it has been around a long time but the emphasis  placed upon it is certainly a modern phenomenon.

Another significant contribution to the guided imagination approach has come from the various psychodynamic processes that surfaced, particularly in America, from the mid-twentieth century onward. Although deeply influenced by the materialism of analytical psychology and behaviourism, and invariably defined in the psychological language of Freud, Jung and their successors, they are often to be found at the heart of many systems of modern spirituality and self-development.

Another dimension in modern thinking about meditation is the concept of ‘endorphins’. These small protein molecules, produced by cells in the body, work to relieve pain with sedative receptors found in the brain, spinal cord and nerve endings. They come in several forms and are many times more powerful than pharmaceutical analgesics. Endorphins are understood to relieve pain, enhance the immune system and reduce stress, but more significantly, especially from the point of view of this discussion, they induce an enhanced feeling of well-being.

There are several methods known to stimulate the body’s production of endorphins including acupuncture, shiatsu, massage, creative visualisation and a variety of relaxation techniques. Many of these methods are now promoted under the banner of meditation. Consequently, in the popular culture of the Western world, meditation has become synonymous with the practise of guided imagining directed towards evoking an experience of bliss and well­being. That notwithstanding, as valuable as such tools may be, especially in therapeutic terms, they have little in common with the objectives and disciplines of traditional meditation. The natural ‘high’ that may occur in traditional meditation, however welcome, is not in itself the main objective but a by-product of the main endeavour, which is invariably self-knowledge and or union with God.

To understand what traditional meditation actually is one must be prepared to peel away the many layers of preconceptions surrounding it in the modern world. A common opinion expressed in our secular world is that like all things in our civilisation the art of meditation has evolved in line with our growing understanding of the world – that we have outgrown the traditional approach with all of its outmoded religious connotations – and that the old must give way to the new. This opinion, and it is an opinion, is frequently presented as a 'matter of fact' in line with social evolution.

Alternatively, we may recognise, and even accept, that traditional meditation is an ancient method of self-enquiry conceived and designed to engage with the underlying reality of existence, a reality that is eternal and changeless and thus beyond biological need or the ambitions of society. Although ancient, it is a method that is still valuable today. This traditional perspective may be a radical point of view in modern terms, however, it should be noted that from a traditional and classical point of view meditation has long been understood to be a private and introspective discipline of applied thought whereby, in a chemical free state of deep relaxation, the faculties of the mind are concentrated upon a given theme or subject. In short, traditional meditation is mind control developed through thinking about a given subject.

In the precincts of the sanctuary, wherein traditional meditation evolved, the subject matter to be meditated upon was usually, although not always, derived from sacred texts. Thus in Buddhism the theme was generally taken from the various writings that constitute the Dharma and the life of the Buddha. In Vedanta the theme would be drawn from the Vedas or the Upanishads, and in the Christian world the theme would usually be drawn from the Scriptures and the life of Christ.

The simple act of thinking deeply about a given subject constitutes the core discipline of traditional meditation. The mind does not necessarily have to be focussed upon religious or spiritual themes but it should be noted that the discipline of traditional meditation did evolve within the precincts of the sanctuary and has been nurtured therein for as long any one can tell. In those environs meditating, or thinking deeply about spiritual themes, establishes the context for the student to engage with the fundamental questions of existence, such as, ‘Who am I?’ and ‘What is the purpose of life?’ It begins as an exercise in reasoning, but gradually becomes an inward journey of self-knowledge where reason, being inadequate for the task, is displaced by intuition. It is a discipline that is initially difficult to learn, but once learnt has surprising and often sublime results.

An interesting feature of the sacred texts of the world is that they have many levels of meaning embedded within them. From the earliest times symbols, metaphors and allegories were widely employed by those who created these texts. Such devices may not serve those who choose to look at them as literal or mythical accounts of the distant past but, for those who approach them with an open mind, symbols, metaphors and allegories often serve as keys to the spiritual wisdom and understanding contained therein. Spiritual teachings are often presented in the form of stories or myths; indeed, the Bible may be seen as a collection of such stories, stories that many accept as true historical accounts.

Whether historically true or not the sacred texts do conceal great spiritual truths that were clearly thought too profound for the spiritually naïve and many subtleties were employed in maintaining and safeguarding them; their composition being designed in such a way that they could be discussed and interpreted on different levels, depending on the level of understanding of the student, each giving a different or deeper insight to the story. 

Philo Judaeus, who lived in the Egyptian city of Alexandria during the first century AD, wrote extensively about the allegorical interpretation of the Scriptures. Much later, Moses de Leon, who lived during the late thirteenth century, likened the Scriptures to a nut with a shell of literal meaning on the outside and an essential or mystical meaning within. He summed up his understanding of this in the word ‘PARDeS’, which means Garden or Paradise – alluding to an illumined mind. The word is a cipher concealing an esoteric understanding of existence. Each consonant of this word refers to a method of extrapolating meaning; thus P represents the literal meaning; R represents the allegorical meaning, particularly in the moral sense; D represents the metaphorical meaning, particularly in the symbolic sense, and S stands for the mystical meaning. Arthur Edward Waite, a celebrated English mystic of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, describing the same thing, said that P equals the literal, R the symbolic, D the allegorical, and finally S equals the mystical sense.

Over the centuries different systems of traditional meditation have emerged, many of which are based on the premise that the discursive activities of the mind may be brought to a standstill by focussing the attention on one subject to the exclusion of all others, thereby revealing the true and permanent reality underpinning all things.

Although this premise is essentially true, a common mistake is made by some of those engaging in traditional meditation in assuming that one should avoid trying to think when meditating, but trying not to think is like trying not to breathe, almost impossible. The truth is, and it is a truth that has long been understood in the precincts of the sanctuary, that there is a point in the cycle of meditation when the discursive activities of the mind pause or cease, an event that may be facilitated by focussing the attention on one subject; but it is a place one arrives at, not a place one starts from. To focus on the breath is a means of stilling the biochemistry of the body, thereby slowing down the mental and emotional activity of the mind. It is the first stage of meditation and has been universally employed in this manner for as long as any can tell. To concentrate the mind on a significant concept or idea is the second stage, although both may be initiated simultaneously.

In the schools wherein spiritual development is the primary objective the focal point of concentration is usually the Scriptures, to which the wandering attention is always returned. However, this activity, no matter how rewarding it may be in terms of inspiration, is not the ultimate objective; meditation is not an endless path of cerebral activity, nor is it an endless state of emptiness. Like all things in the natural world there is a cycle of activity which the traditional schools have come to understand and to which they adhere. That natural cycle, clearly obvious in the rotation of the seasons, consists of directing the mind towards a single activity that results, eventually, in a form of realisation culminating in a period of profound stillness.

Meditation is not in itself the objective but a means of achieving the objective. For those who persevere on this path the discipline of meditation leads the student into the exalted and sublime state of Contemplation, wherein the mysteries of existence are slowly revealed to the maturing student. This is the main objective of traditional meditation.

The term ‘meditation’ has then, in recent times, come to signify two different undertakings. The first is traditional meditation, which is a method of mind control that from the earliest times has been directed towards self-knowledge and spiritual insight. The second is a modern concept of meditation, which is a therapeutic method with many variations directed towards inducing a sense of well-being as an antidote to the stresses of modern living, focussing upon the use of the imagination as a means of inducing the desired effect.

The modern concept of meditation is also applied in certain schools in the development of psychic abilities and skills, such as astral projection and clairvoyance. As such it no longer falls under the heading of meditation and arguably should go by a different name as it has little in common with meditation in general.

This is not to criticise such undertakings. I cannot speak for such schools as I am not privy to their councils, and by the same token I cannot speak against them. Nevertheless I do think it important to make a distinction between them and their very different objectives from traditional and modern therapeutic methods.

Traditional meditation, with its focus on mind control and self-knowledge, is fundamentally different from the majority of modern meditational systems which are therapeutic in nature and focussed upon creative imagination, and both of these differ from the psychically dynamic processes presented in certain schools as meditation.

If there is any confusion in making a distinction between them it must inevitably rest in the fact that although they all share certain ideas and processes in common, the objectives and the application of such processes vary greatly.

Consequently, the student who seeks union with the divine will be better served following the path of traditional meditation in whatever school they are led to. Alternatively, the student who is looking for respite from the stresses and strains of the world will be better served undertaking a modern therapeutic method involving creative imagination etc. Those who are called to the magical arts will inevitably gravitate to the school most suitable to their temperament. #brothermarcusodp

  

  

If you would like to know more about Notes on Meditation then visit http://www.imagier.com/books/nom.htm

Alternatively, you can order a copy through your local bookshop.
Details: Notes on Meditation, by Allan Armstrong;
ISBN: 978-0-9558415-7-6
Price £12.50